|
||
|
|
STUDIES IN MALACHI No. 1 Introduction January 12, 2003 Tonight we begin a series of studies in the last book of the Old Testament, the Prophecy of Malachi. Malachi is one of what are called the "Minor Prophets," minor only in the sense that their books are shorter than those of the major prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. It was the Latin writers who spoke of them as the Minor Prophets, the Jewish and Greek writers spoke of them simply as The Twelve Prophets. There are, of course, twelve of these small books from Hosea to Malachi. They were in Jewish thought linked together as a division of the Scripture and referred to as "The Twelve." In a Jewish writing dated approximately 200 years before Christ there is a reference to "the Twelve Prophets," (Ecclesiasticus 49:10), almost certainly indicating that before that time the twelve minor prophets were considered, if not actually gathered into, a single volume. I chose Malachi for several reasons.
I want to begin, this evening, by putting the book in its historic context. The first eleven chapters of the Bible provide us with the primitive history of mankind. Then, in the rest of Genesis, the focus narrows on God's chosen covenant partner, Abraham, and his seed. Central to the covenant God made with Abraham is the promise of land, the land of Canaan, though Abraham is told that it will be centuries before his heirs take possession of the Promised Land. By the end of Genesis and the beginning of Exodus, Abraham's family has become a nation. That nation, Israel, God's chosen people, was delivered from bondage in Egypt and brought into the wilderness where, because of her rebellion, she wandered 40 years. After the death of Moses, Joshua, his successor, finally led Israel into the Promised Land where she would dwell for the next 7 centuries or more in her entirety, and a further century and a half as a remnant. Joshua was succeeded by the Judges, a series of charismatic leaders who ruled Israel or a portion of Israel over the next 400 years, the last and greatest of whom was Samuel. It was Samuel who anointed both the first and the second king of the nation of Israel, Saul and then David. Those two, together with David's son, Solomon, reigned over the nation as a whole, all 12 tribes. But after the death of Solomon, the kingdom was torn in two, divine judgment on Solomon for the sins that marked the latter half of his reign. From that point onward there were two kingdoms, the northern one consisting of the 10 northern tribes, ordinarily referred to as Israel, with Samaria as its capital, and the southern one, called Judah after the most prominent of the two southern tribes, the other being Benjamin. The northern kingdom was apostate from the very beginning, at least its official position was that of spiritual rebellion against the Lord and his covenant. False and idolatrous worship was introduced by the first king and never eradicated. There were pious folk among its population, but they were few in number and completely marginalized in their influence. Even the succession of great prophets that were sent to Israel did not succeed in summoning her to repentance. That succession included such luminaries as Elijah and Elisha, Jonah, Hosea, and Amos, as well as other men, including some whose names we know, who never wrote books of the Bible. At some point in the 7th or 8th century B.C., Israel, the northern kingdom, passed the spiritual point of no return. The hammer blow of divine judgment fell upon her, wielded by the Assyrian empire, in 721 B.C. The population of Israel was removed from the land and scattered among the other subject people's of the empire and Israel as a political entity ceased to exist. There were some few folk, from the ten northern tribes, who had already moved south or who somehow escaped the deportation, so you might find a few folk, like the prophetess Anna, who met the infant Jesus in the temple, who hailed from Asher, one of the northern tribes. But, by and large, the Jews, as a people known to human history since before Christ and up to the present day, descend from the southern kingdom and the northern tribes have simply disappeared, their distinct identity having been dissolved by thorough mixture with the Gentile world. Indeed, it is very doubtful than any Jew, nowadays, could safely claim knowledge of his or her ancestry in any of the northern tribes. A Jew is, for all intents and purposes, a descendant of the people who formed the southern kingdom. The southern two tribes, usually referred to as Judah, from the beginning of their separate history after the reign of Solomon, experienced an alternation of good and bad kings and of more or less faithful and unfaithful national life as the people of God. Good kings such as Asa, Hezekiah and Josiah enacted spiritual reforms and bad kings such as Ahaz and Manasseh undid those reforms and accommodated Judah's life and worship to the customs and the convictions of the peoples round about. A succession of bad kings, beginning with and following upon the long 55 year reign of Manasseh, led finally to Judah's judgment at the hands of the Babylonians. The judgment fell in successive stages, but finally and catastrophically in 586 B.C. Jerusalem was destroyed, the nation's political, religious, social, and economic leadership was deported to Babylon and only peasants left to work the land on behalf of the conquerors. This "exile" was the curse for covenantal unfaithfulness that had long before been promised in the law of God, just as prosperity in the land was the blessing promised for covenantal faithfulness. Jeremiah, whose prophetic ministry spanned the last years of Judah's independent existence and the first few years of the exile, had prophesied that Judah would remain in exile for 70 years. In fact, God was better than his word. It was barely 50 years after the destruction of Jerusalem in 586, 60 from an earlier deportation in 597, and still less than 70 from the token first deportation in 605 when the Jews, in 538 B.C. were granted permission to return to Judea and Jerusalem. Things would, of course, never be the same as once they were. Judah was no longer a great nation and would never be again. She was ruled as a small client kingdom by a mighty empire - she was just one of 120 provinces of the vast Persian empire - and, from the viewpoint of the imperial court, Judea was no more, no less than scores of other client states that existed to pay taxes into the imperial treasury. The stage of world politics was dominated by great empires and would be for centuries to come. The fate of Judah would be determined at the whim of great empires for whom Jerusalem was nothing more than a small spot on the map. She was to be for a long time a small piece of flotsam caught up from time to time in the maelstrom of Ancient Near Eastern political and military movements. And so it would be until her national life ended completely in A.D. 70 when the Romans, tired of dealing with rebellions fed by nationalistic aspirations among the Jews, subdued the nation by military action, destroyed Jerusalem, and dissolved Judea completely into the administrative structure of the empire. So it was a small company that returned to Judah from Babylon after the exile and it was to very diminished circumstances that they returned. The city of Jerusalem itself was still largely in ruins from its destruction 50 years before. The walls of the city were broken down. The country was poor. Her territory was reduced to the City of Jerusalem itself and its environs, approximately 20 miles by 25 miles. The population probably did not number more than 150,000 people. [Stuart, 1253] But a new beginning was made. The ministry of the two prophets, Haggai and Zechariah, which began shortly after the exiles returned from Babylon (Haggai's ministry, so far as it is reported in his book, was in 520 B.C.; Zechariah's about the same time) encouraged them. By 516 B.C. a new temple had been built, even if it did not compare with Solomon's temple. But the City of Jerusalem remained a ruin, inhabited only here and there by squatters. Agriculture did not rebound quickly and many of the people remained poor. The taxes, tolls, and tributes that had to be paid to the Persian imperial treasury ensured that economic activity would remain sluggish. The returning exiles may have expected that once back in the Promised Land God would immediately establish the glory of his kingdom as in former days, but those hopes soon faded. Only a few of the folk who had been exiled returned and those who did found that the people then living in the land were neither happy to see them nor willing to let them rebuild their country. They frustrated every effort to recreate the country that had been destroyed decades before by the Babylonians. Discouragement quickly set in. But Haggai and Zechariah's ministry produced "a revival of sorts" [Collins, 56]. Both Haggai and Zechariah spoke of the Messiah's coming and of the establishment of his kingdom, but decades had now passed and the Messiah had still not come. By Malachi's time the new enthusiasm and hopefulness had faded. The people were past believing that God was going to do anything grand on their behalf. It was now a time of spiritual discouragement, of complaining, of growing indifference to God's law, of perfunctory worship. Spiritual doldrums had set in. So the situation Malachi faced was the same situation faced by Ezra, when he came to Jerusalem in 458 B.C., eighty years after the first return of exiles from Babylon, and by Nehemiah when he came to Jerusalem in 445 B.C. Precisely how Malachi fits into the Ezra/Nehemiah chronology we cannot tell, but it seems to have been about the same time. One indication of this is that the concerns raised by Ezra and Nehemiah in their work of reformation are some of the same that are mentioned by Malachi: spiritually mixed marriages, the neglect of tithing, disregard for keeping the Sabbath, the corruption of the priesthood, and social injustice. [Collins, 56] You find the same subjects in Malachi that you find in Ezra and Nehemiah. Jack Collins and some other scholars I have read suggest that it is most likely that Malachi preached before the reforms of Ezra and Nehemiah, preparing the way for them, preparing the hearts of the people to receive them and to embrace them when they were enacted. [Stuart, 1253] Now let's consider as we begin the obvious fact that the historical setting of Malachi confirms and that is reconfirmed wherever we read in the Bible and by our own observation and experience as Christians. You can put this point in various ways. 1. For example, we can observe, as the Bible teaches us to observe, that in the history of the kingdom of God there are long stretches in which very little happens.
2. You can put the basic lesson of Malachi's historical situation in another way.
|
*Dial-up users: Get a glimpse of our website's future...(screenshot)
Interested in Podcasts? |
|
|
||